Equipment

If it doesn't fit into a category above, then inscribe it here, O Mighty One...

Moderators: DJ LaBoss, finarvyn, michaelcurtis, Harley Stroh

Post Reply
jmucchiello
Chaos-Summoning Sorcerer
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:28 am

Equipment

Post by jmucchiello »

I certainly hope 5-6 pages are spent on mundane equipment for this game. If the spells are illustrated, I hope the equipment page is too.
User avatar
finarvyn
Cold-Hearted Immortal
Posts: 2599
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:42 am
FLGS: Fair Game, Downers Grove IL
Location: Chicago suburbs
Contact:

Re: Equipment

Post by finarvyn »

It depends upon how much Joseph is trying to mirror the early editions of RGs. Early games tended to have really short equpiment lists, assuming that a GM could "wing it" if an item wasn't covered in the list.
Marv / Finarvyn
DCC Minister of Propaganda; Deputized 6/8/11 (over 11 years of SPAM bustin'!)
DCC RPG playtester 2011, DCC Lankhmar trivia contest winner 2015; OD&D player since 1975

"The worthy GM never purposely kills players' PCs, He presents opportunities for the rash and unthinking players to do that all on their own."
-- Gary Gygax
"Don't ask me what you need to hit. Just roll the die and I will let you know!"
-- Dave Arneson
"Misinterpreting the rules is a shared memory for many of us"
-- Joseph Goodman
User avatar
GnomeBoy
Tyrant Master (Administrator)
Posts: 4128
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 1:46 pm
FLGS: Bizarro World
Location: Left Coast, USA
Contact:

Re: Equipment

Post by GnomeBoy »

I'm actually something of a fan of "your weapon does 1d6 damage" and leaving it at that. Games that feature guns, I don't care about the differences (and don't care about hearing people complain that the real world differences are not accurate/there at all). Games with pole-arms, swords, etc. need only reflect the obvious stuff (e.g. reach, for one) and not make too much of a big deal of details, if they are all lethal in the right hands.

But that's just me.

Literally. :mrgreen:

As for other equipment, I hope there's a nice one-column list of things you can load yourself down with and loose when you almost plummet off of that rickety rope bridge.
...
Gnome Boy • DCC playtester @ DDC 35 Feb '11. • Beta DL 2111, 7AM PT, 8 June 11.
Playing RPGs since '77 • Quasi-occasional member of the Legion of 8th-Level Fighters.

Link: Here Be 100+ DCC Monsters

bygrinstow.com - The Home of Inner Ham
goodmangames
Cold-Hearted Immortal
Posts: 2704
Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 12:41 pm
Location: San Jose, CA

Re: Equipment

Post by goodmangames »

Right now the equipment list is REALLY short. And no plans for illustrations. I think we all know what a backpack looks like at this point. :) I'd rather spend my art budget giving Easley and Holloway and the rest of them some awesome ideas for dungeoneering scenes...
Joseph Goodman
Goodman Games
www.goodman-games.com
User avatar
GnomeBoy
Tyrant Master (Administrator)
Posts: 4128
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 1:46 pm
FLGS: Bizarro World
Location: Left Coast, USA
Contact:

Re: Equipment

Post by GnomeBoy »

Awww -- but I've always wanted to see how Easley would render a ten-foot pole and coil of rope... :cry:
...
Gnome Boy • DCC playtester @ DDC 35 Feb '11. • Beta DL 2111, 7AM PT, 8 June 11.
Playing RPGs since '77 • Quasi-occasional member of the Legion of 8th-Level Fighters.

Link: Here Be 100+ DCC Monsters

bygrinstow.com - The Home of Inner Ham
User avatar
finarvyn
Cold-Hearted Immortal
Posts: 2599
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:42 am
FLGS: Fair Game, Downers Grove IL
Location: Chicago suburbs
Contact:

Re: Equipment

Post by finarvyn »

GnomeBoy wrote:I'm actually something of a fan of "your weapon does 1d6 damage" and leaving it at that. Games that feature guns, I don't care about the differences (and don't care about hearing people complain that the real world differences are not accurate/there at all). Games with pole-arms, swords, etc. need only reflect the obvious stuff (e.g. reach, for one) and not make too much of a big deal of details, if they are all lethal in the right hands.

But that's just me.
Not just you! :D

I think that this rule tends to minimize the players who pick obscure weapons just to get an extra +1 on damage. Any way to cut down on artificial MIN/MAX in the rules is a good thing, in my book!
Marv / Finarvyn
DCC Minister of Propaganda; Deputized 6/8/11 (over 11 years of SPAM bustin'!)
DCC RPG playtester 2011, DCC Lankhmar trivia contest winner 2015; OD&D player since 1975

"The worthy GM never purposely kills players' PCs, He presents opportunities for the rash and unthinking players to do that all on their own."
-- Gary Gygax
"Don't ask me what you need to hit. Just roll the die and I will let you know!"
-- Dave Arneson
"Misinterpreting the rules is a shared memory for many of us"
-- Joseph Goodman
User avatar
finarvyn
Cold-Hearted Immortal
Posts: 2599
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:42 am
FLGS: Fair Game, Downers Grove IL
Location: Chicago suburbs
Contact:

Re: Equipment

Post by finarvyn »

GnomeBoy wrote:Awww -- but I've always wanted to see how Easley would render a ten-foot pole and coil of rope... :cry:
Well, there are different types of rope (large hemp rope, thin silky rope...) and maybe a player really wants to see it before he buys it. Ten-foot poles sound pretty generic, however. :lol:
Marv / Finarvyn
DCC Minister of Propaganda; Deputized 6/8/11 (over 11 years of SPAM bustin'!)
DCC RPG playtester 2011, DCC Lankhmar trivia contest winner 2015; OD&D player since 1975

"The worthy GM never purposely kills players' PCs, He presents opportunities for the rash and unthinking players to do that all on their own."
-- Gary Gygax
"Don't ask me what you need to hit. Just roll the die and I will let you know!"
-- Dave Arneson
"Misinterpreting the rules is a shared memory for many of us"
-- Joseph Goodman
jmucchiello
Chaos-Summoning Sorcerer
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:28 am

Re: Equipment

Post by jmucchiello »

finarvyn wrote:
GnomeBoy wrote:I'm actually something of a fan of "your weapon does 1d6 damage" and leaving it at that. Games that feature guns, I don't care about the differences (and don't care about hearing people complain that the real world differences are not accurate/there at all). Games with pole-arms, swords, etc. need only reflect the obvious stuff (e.g. reach, for one) and not make too much of a big deal of details, if they are all lethal in the right hands.

But that's just me.
Not just you! :D

I think that this rule tends to minimize the players who pick obscure weapons just to get an extra +1 on damage. Any way to cut down on artificial MIN/MAX in the rules is a good thing, in my book!
This is great and I agree with flat damage by class for all weapons. But this thread is about equipment. I didn't really mean arms and armor.
jmucchiello
Chaos-Summoning Sorcerer
Posts: 779
Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:28 am

Re: Equipment

Post by jmucchiello »

GnomeBoy wrote:Awww -- but I've always wanted to see how Easley would render a ten-foot pole and coil of rope... :cry:
More Pitons!!
User avatar
DCCfan
Steely-Eyed Heathen-Slayer
Posts: 638
Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 6:23 am
FLGS: The Comics Club
Location: Auburndale, FL

Re: Equipment

Post by DCCfan »

goodmangames wrote:Right now the equipment list is REALLY short. And no plans for illustrations. I think we all know what a backpack looks like at this point. :) I'd rather spend my art budget giving Easley and Holloway and the rest of them some awesome ideas for dungeoneering scenes...
Thank the gods. I don't need pictures of lanterns and crowbars. :roll:
However I wouldn't mind if they are in a cool dungeon scene. One where an adventurer is breaking his lantern over a mummies head while the other one is trying desperately to pry open a secret door so they can escape.
"When creating your character,choose an ethical system that can justify nearly any fit of temper, greed, cowardice, or vindictiveness, for example, Chaotic Violent..."

THE PROTOCOLS, ADVANCED PROTOCOL #10
Geoffrey
Hard-Bitten Adventurer
Posts: 184
Joined: Sat Jul 15, 2006 10:09 am

Re: Equipment

Post by Geoffrey »

goodmangames wrote:Right now the equipment list is REALLY short. And no plans for illustrations. I think we all know what a backpack looks like at this point. :) I'd rather spend my art budget giving Easley and Holloway and the rest of them some awesome ideas for dungeoneering scenes...
Good. The equipment list in the 1974 D&D rules is the right length, IMO.
Click here to purchase my five AD&D modules.
Each of these modules is self-contained. No other books are required other than the three AD&D rulebooks (or a similar set of rules if you prefer).
Click here to purchase prints of Luigi Castellani's cover art for these modules.
User avatar
geordie racer
Mighty-Thewed Reaver
Posts: 376
Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2011 5:13 am
Location: Newcastle, England

Re: Equipment

Post by geordie racer »

Geoffrey wrote:
goodmangames wrote:Right now the equipment list is REALLY short. And no plans for illustrations. I think we all know what a backpack looks like at this point. :) I'd rather spend my art budget giving Easley and Holloway and the rest of them some awesome ideas for dungeoneering scenes...
Good. The equipment list in the 1974 D&D rules is the right length, IMO.
I agree. Any other equipment that is more setting-specific could always appear in the modules and annuals.
Sean Wills
Post Reply

Return to “DCC RPG General”