Some more rules questions
Moderators: DJ LaBoss, michaelcurtis, finarvyn, Harley Stroh
- Sir Robilar
- Far-Sighted Wanderer
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:38 pm
Some more rules questions
Here are some questions that arose during our regular campaign. As always, thanks for your insights!
1. Can the Halfling burn his Luck on the Wizard’s spell check? Seems like it to me, but wouldn’t that be much too powerful?
2. How is the Cleric supposed to reach the higher spell results?
3. If multiple characters try to break down a door together, how do you handle it? Examples, some from Goodman’s modules, would be:
- Everyone rolls his own Str-check, ignoring all others.
- +2 to the check for each character helping on one rolled check, with a set maximum of characters that can help.
- Only characters with a positive strength modifier can help and simply add their modifier to one roll made by the strongest.
- The characters need a combined Strength score (not modifier) to automatically succeed. I think this one is from Sailors and I'm quite fond of it.
3.5 If there is a set Strength DC to break down a door in the adventure and one character wants to break the door down alone without any time pressure. Would you have him roll until he makes the roll or just decide that he manages to do so after some time has passed?
4. How would you handle surprise in this situation: The characters know that multiple invisible foes are in a room. They walk into the room, weapons ready. The invisible creatures silently take position wherever they want and then attack, instantly ending their invisibility. Would they get surprise attacks before Initiative is rolled or would Initiative be rolled normally?
1. Can the Halfling burn his Luck on the Wizard’s spell check? Seems like it to me, but wouldn’t that be much too powerful?
2. How is the Cleric supposed to reach the higher spell results?
3. If multiple characters try to break down a door together, how do you handle it? Examples, some from Goodman’s modules, would be:
- Everyone rolls his own Str-check, ignoring all others.
- +2 to the check for each character helping on one rolled check, with a set maximum of characters that can help.
- Only characters with a positive strength modifier can help and simply add their modifier to one roll made by the strongest.
- The characters need a combined Strength score (not modifier) to automatically succeed. I think this one is from Sailors and I'm quite fond of it.
3.5 If there is a set Strength DC to break down a door in the adventure and one character wants to break the door down alone without any time pressure. Would you have him roll until he makes the roll or just decide that he manages to do so after some time has passed?
4. How would you handle surprise in this situation: The characters know that multiple invisible foes are in a room. They walk into the room, weapons ready. The invisible creatures silently take position wherever they want and then attack, instantly ending their invisibility. Would they get surprise attacks before Initiative is rolled or would Initiative be rolled normally?
Re: Some more rules questions
1. Yes.
2. Luck, most obviously. Then, other circumstance bonuses, maybe group rituals? Raven_Crowking and I disagree about whether a Cleric ought to be able to spellburn divine aid, although the rules don't forbid it they do specifically say Clerics can't spellburn spell checks under normal circumstances. Also, Bless can provide longer lasting bonuses to spell checks; other spells or items may do the same.
3. The best way to do it is, IMHO, the second one. I like a little randomness in it, otherwise the last one would be the best.
3.5. Noise could be a factor. The more/longer you have to roll, the more noise you're making, right?
4. I'd roll for surprise. Generally monsters either surprise the party or they don't, but if both sides have a chance, then I'd roll... for example, some monsters surprise on a 1-4 in d6, so I'd roll that if the party was being cautious / looking out / preparing. If they were just blundering along, forget it, they're just surprised.
2. Luck, most obviously. Then, other circumstance bonuses, maybe group rituals? Raven_Crowking and I disagree about whether a Cleric ought to be able to spellburn divine aid, although the rules don't forbid it they do specifically say Clerics can't spellburn spell checks under normal circumstances. Also, Bless can provide longer lasting bonuses to spell checks; other spells or items may do the same.
3. The best way to do it is, IMHO, the second one. I like a little randomness in it, otherwise the last one would be the best.
3.5. Noise could be a factor. The more/longer you have to roll, the more noise you're making, right?
4. I'd roll for surprise. Generally monsters either surprise the party or they don't, but if both sides have a chance, then I'd roll... for example, some monsters surprise on a 1-4 in d6, so I'd roll that if the party was being cautious / looking out / preparing. If they were just blundering along, forget it, they're just surprised.
- Raven_Crowking
- Cold-Hearted Immortal
- Posts: 3159
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:41 am
- FLGS: The Sword & Board
- Contact:
Re: Some more rules questions
In my games, the Lucky Charm certainly can.Sir Robilar wrote:Here are some questions that arose during our regular campaign. As always, thanks for your insights!
1. Can the Halfling burn his Luck on the Wizard’s spell check? Seems like it to me, but wouldn’t that be much too powerful?
Luck.2. How is the Cleric supposed to reach the higher spell results?
Whatever you feel works best for the situation at hand. Different doors might have different circumstances/rules. I am actually a big fan of this.3. If multiple characters try to break down a door together, how do you handle it? Examples, some from Goodman’s modules, would be:
- Everyone rolls his own Str-check, ignoring all others.
- +2 to the check for each character helping on one rolled check, with a set maximum of characters that can help.
- Only characters with a positive strength modifier can help and simply add their modifier to one roll made by the strongest.
- The characters need a combined Strength score (not modifier) to automatically succeed. I think this one is from Sailors and I'm quite fond of it.
General rule: Three Strikes and You're Out. If DC 20 is a superhuman feat, there is no "Take 10" or "Take 20" in my game. I would let you roll on a higher die in the dice chain, though, the represent the extra care taken.3.5 If there is a set Strength DC to break down a door in the adventure and one character wants to break the door down alone without any time pressure. Would you have him roll until he makes the roll or just decide that he manages to do so after some time has passed?
I would roll initiative normally, but if the creatures are also silent, there is very little chance that a PC will be able to take effective action. What I would say happens is that PCs who beat the invisible creature's Init gain a Luck check (Roll Luck or under on 1d20) to hear the creatures just before they attack (possibly as a result of that attack), thus allowing a pre-emptive strike attempt with a 50% miss chance.4. How would you handle surprise in this situation: The characters know that multiple invisible foes are in a room. They walk into the room, weapons ready. The invisible creatures silently take position wherever they want and then attack, instantly ending their invisibility. Would they get surprise attacks before Initiative is rolled or would Initiative be rolled normally?
SoBH pbp:
Cathbad the Meek (herbalist Wizard 1): AC 9; 4 hp; S 7, A 7, St 10, P 17, I 13, L 8; Neutral; Club, herbs, 50' rope, 50 cp; -1 to melee attack rolls. Hideous scar.
Cathbad the Meek (herbalist Wizard 1): AC 9; 4 hp; S 7, A 7, St 10, P 17, I 13, L 8; Neutral; Club, herbs, 50' rope, 50 cp; -1 to melee attack rolls. Hideous scar.
- Raven_Crowking
- Cold-Hearted Immortal
- Posts: 3159
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:41 am
- FLGS: The Sword & Board
- Contact:
Re: Some more rules questions
The correct interpretation is mine. In my game.beermotor wrote:Raven_Crowking and I disagree about whether a Cleric ought to be able to spellburn divine aid, although the rules don't forbid it they do specifically say Clerics can't spellburn spell checks under normal circumstances. Also, Bless can provide longer lasting bonuses to spell checks; other spells or items may do the same.
The correct interpretation is beermotor's. In his game.
One of the core strengths of this game is embodied in the words, "Fear No Rule".
SoBH pbp:
Cathbad the Meek (herbalist Wizard 1): AC 9; 4 hp; S 7, A 7, St 10, P 17, I 13, L 8; Neutral; Club, herbs, 50' rope, 50 cp; -1 to melee attack rolls. Hideous scar.
Cathbad the Meek (herbalist Wizard 1): AC 9; 4 hp; S 7, A 7, St 10, P 17, I 13, L 8; Neutral; Club, herbs, 50' rope, 50 cp; -1 to melee attack rolls. Hideous scar.
Re: Some more rules questions
Absolutely. I think it's helpful to discuss where disagreements are and provide reasoning, so people can choose for their own games.Raven_Crowking wrote:The correct interpretation is mine. In my game.beermotor wrote:Raven_Crowking and I disagree about whether a Cleric ought to be able to spellburn divine aid, although the rules don't forbid it they do specifically say Clerics can't spellburn spell checks under normal circumstances. Also, Bless can provide longer lasting bonuses to spell checks; other spells or items may do the same.
The correct interpretation is beermotor's. In his game.
One of the core strengths of this game is embodied in the words, "Fear No Rule".
-
- Cold-Hearted Immortal
- Posts: 1095
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 12:52 pm
- Location: Richmond, VA
- Contact:
Re: Some more rules questions
Historically, I've used all four options. It varies on the circumstance. I have these sort of "group checks" baked into rules that appear in Transylvanian Adventures. That now works for about 90% of all these sorts of issues, regardless of the d20-based game used.Raven_Crowking wrote:Whatever you feel works best for the situation at hand. Different doors might have different circumstances/rules. I am actually a big fan of this.3. If multiple characters try to break down a door together, how do you handle it? Examples, some from Goodman’s modules, would be:
- Everyone rolls his own Str-check, ignoring all others.
- +2 to the check for each character helping on one rolled check, with a set maximum of characters that can help.
- Only characters with a positive strength modifier can help and simply add their modifier to one roll made by the strongest.
- The characters need a combined Strength score (not modifier) to automatically succeed. I think this one is from Sailors and I'm quite fond of it.
Generally, I've ruled that if a character fails then they must try some other means to overcome the obstacle (i.e. pick a lock, try to pop off the hinges, cut their way through, use magic or find another entry). Transylvanian Adventures also introduces variants that handle the "this is the only way in and I really have to get through this door" situations. Common wisdom is to not design an adventure or dungeon around that kind of logjam. But, in a way, that's also a bit like handing out a trophy for just showing up. There's nothing accomplished, just a list of gimmes that the players can't possibly find challenging. The "skill" variants in Transylvanian Adventures solves this problem too. It allows for logjams to be bypassed at a cost. Which I think is preferable to just forcing a clue or entrypoint upon a group of players.Raven_Crowking wrote:General rule: Three Strikes and You're Out. If DC 20 is a superhuman feat, there is no "Take 10" or "Take 20" in my game. I would let you roll on a higher die in the dice chain, though, the represent the extra care taken.3.5 If there is a set Strength DC to break down a door in the adventure and one character wants to break the door down alone without any time pressure. Would you have him roll until he makes the roll or just decide that he manages to do so after some time has passed?
I'd much rather have more complications and more story than just hand out clues and "successes" like Hansel and Gretel on the path to a candy house.
I very likely am the only person who feels this way.
There's also the question of what constitutes the need for a skill check roll. I mean, I rarely have players roll to Search something -- unless it's really, really well hidden. And most of the time a player can avoid a skill roll if they just describe what they're doing in a way that it makes sense. I prefer the dice to give randomization -- as opposed to binary pass/fail.
I digress and am talking like a crazy person right now. So I'll stop. but you get the drift...
- Sir Robilar
- Far-Sighted Wanderer
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:38 pm
Re: Some more rules questions
Thanks a lot for all of your insights! Great help yet again.
Smathis, I really like your idea that when the characters fail they have to try to overcome the obstacle with other means! I will give this a try, let's hope my players won't rebel against it.
I'm ok with ruling some things like the breaking down doors example from occurrence to occurrence. Unfortunately I have experienced players that hate it when one thing is ruled in this way once and in another way later. These kinds of players would nail me down on ruling something in one way forever. Probably I should try harder to convey the philosophy.
Smathis, I really like your idea that when the characters fail they have to try to overcome the obstacle with other means! I will give this a try, let's hope my players won't rebel against it.
I'm ok with ruling some things like the breaking down doors example from occurrence to occurrence. Unfortunately I have experienced players that hate it when one thing is ruled in this way once and in another way later. These kinds of players would nail me down on ruling something in one way forever. Probably I should try harder to convey the philosophy.
Re: Some more rules questions
One could conceivably allow spellburn for Cleric's as a Divine Aid request. Essentially, "I sacrifice my life force for a power boost." Maybe make it burn at two stat points for for +1?
My Gaming Blog: The Earthlight Academy
http://earthlightacademy.blogspot.com/
http://earthlightacademy.blogspot.com/
Re: Some more rules questions
Certain sects of religions in my world give the cleric a "spellburn" like ability. As raven said -- Fear no Rule (even some other Judge's interpretation). Hell, I think I would allow a "spellburn" type of function to a character trying to open a door -- might work as a "you try so hard you hurt yourself, but with the extra reserve of Strength..."
Dunno. I'll have to think on it.
Dunno. I'll have to think on it.
AKA Paul Wolfe
The Mystic Bull: Check out our two FREE prehistoric adventures: The Steading of the Nergalites AND The Tribe of Ogg and the Gift of Suss
In the Prison of the Squid Sorcerer (PDF) and softcover: 12 Short Adventures for DCC!
The God-Seed Awakens: 3rd Level Adventure for DCC. New patron, new spells, lots of new monsters and the living weapons of the Empire of Thal!
My Gamer Profile
The Mystic Bull: Check out our two FREE prehistoric adventures: The Steading of the Nergalites AND The Tribe of Ogg and the Gift of Suss
In the Prison of the Squid Sorcerer (PDF) and softcover: 12 Short Adventures for DCC!
The God-Seed Awakens: 3rd Level Adventure for DCC. New patron, new spells, lots of new monsters and the living weapons of the Empire of Thal!
My Gamer Profile
- GnomeBoy
- Tyrant Master (Administrator)
- Posts: 4128
- Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 1:46 pm
- FLGS: Bizarro World
- Location: Left Coast, USA
- Contact:
Re: Some more rules questions
I'm pretty sure there was talk of this during the playtesting or the beta phase (or both).ragboy wrote:...might work as a "you try so hard you hurt yourself, but with the extra reserve of Strength..."
"Skillburn" -- didn't quite make that jump? Wanna burn some Agility in order to not fall to your death...?
...
Gnome Boy • DCC playtester @ DDC 35 Feb '11. • Beta DL 2111, 7AM PT, 8 June 11.
Playing RPGs since '77 • Quasi-occasional member of the Legion of 8th-Level Fighters.
Link: Here Be 100+ DCC Monsters
bygrinstow.com - The Home of Inner Ham
Gnome Boy • DCC playtester @ DDC 35 Feb '11. • Beta DL 2111, 7AM PT, 8 June 11.
Playing RPGs since '77 • Quasi-occasional member of the Legion of 8th-Level Fighters.
Link: Here Be 100+ DCC Monsters
bygrinstow.com - The Home of Inner Ham
-
- Cold-Blooded Diabolist
- Posts: 471
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 9:14 am
- Location: Cube Farm of Alien Geometry
Re: Some more rules questions
A bloodthirsty chaotic deity could allow a blood sacrifice spellburn while a lawful deity may require 100gp per point worth of exotic incense. Time necessary for each would also vary.beermotor wrote:Absolutely. I think it's helpful to discuss where disagreements are and provide reasoning, so people can choose for their own games.Raven_Crowking wrote:The correct interpretation is mine. In my game.beermotor wrote:Raven_Crowking and I disagree about whether a Cleric ought to be able to spellburn divine aid, although the rules don't forbid it they do specifically say Clerics can't spellburn spell checks under normal circumstances. Also, Bless can provide longer lasting bonuses to spell checks; other spells or items may do the same.
The correct interpretation is beermotor's. In his game.
One of the core strengths of this game is embodied in the words, "Fear No Rule".
- Sir Robilar
- Far-Sighted Wanderer
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:38 pm
Re: Some more rules questions
When reading through the book again today, I came up with some more questions that I remembered came up during our sessions. Again I'd be very interested how you would rule in these cases.
5. Concerning Grappling - When a creature is pinned, do you rule that it can do nothing besides trying to free itself from the pin? I believe the rules text is „it can’t take any significant actions“. Also, would you rule that freeing oneself from a grapple is a use of one's action die? Or does it take, for lack of a better turn, a "full-round action"?
6. Ulfeonar’s Wolf Spear (from Doom of the Savage Kings, p.12) - I don’t quite understand how this is to be used. First of all: „On a successful hit…“ - does this mean that this pinning effect triggers after any successful hit, after the regular weapon damage has been applied? Or is it some kind of special attack, activated when the wielder succesfully ‚hits‘ the foe but not inflicting any damage?
6.5 Then concerning the pinning effect of the spear: Is this the same pin as described in the Grapple rules? Or would you rule that the spear’s pin only reduces the pinned creature’s AC by the spear wielder’s Strength modifier plus rendering the creature unable to move in any mundane or magical way?
7. Falling damage: „For each broken bone, the character permanently loses 1 point of Strength or Agility (player’s choice).“ - I assume that this broken bone, including the ability loss, can be healed by a cleric sacrificing a die use with Healing Hands? Or would you rule that it is not possible to ever heal permanent ability loss?
8. Standing up from Prone - does it take one of your action die to do this or all of your action dice? For example, could a level 6 fighter stand up with his first action die and then make an attack with his other action die in the same round?
9. „A wizard who sacrifices a full 20 points of ability scores in one fell swoop automatically treats his next spell check as a roll of natural 20.“ - pretty sure I saw this discussed somewhere already, but I couldn’t find it just now. The question that came up for us was, wouldn’t it be worse to spellburn 20 points than to spend merely 19? When spending 19, you would roll the d20 and add 19 points for the final spell result, with 20, you would not roll the die and merely add your regular Int + twice your caster level to a fixed result of 20.
Thanks!
5. Concerning Grappling - When a creature is pinned, do you rule that it can do nothing besides trying to free itself from the pin? I believe the rules text is „it can’t take any significant actions“. Also, would you rule that freeing oneself from a grapple is a use of one's action die? Or does it take, for lack of a better turn, a "full-round action"?
6. Ulfeonar’s Wolf Spear (from Doom of the Savage Kings, p.12) - I don’t quite understand how this is to be used. First of all: „On a successful hit…“ - does this mean that this pinning effect triggers after any successful hit, after the regular weapon damage has been applied? Or is it some kind of special attack, activated when the wielder succesfully ‚hits‘ the foe but not inflicting any damage?
6.5 Then concerning the pinning effect of the spear: Is this the same pin as described in the Grapple rules? Or would you rule that the spear’s pin only reduces the pinned creature’s AC by the spear wielder’s Strength modifier plus rendering the creature unable to move in any mundane or magical way?
7. Falling damage: „For each broken bone, the character permanently loses 1 point of Strength or Agility (player’s choice).“ - I assume that this broken bone, including the ability loss, can be healed by a cleric sacrificing a die use with Healing Hands? Or would you rule that it is not possible to ever heal permanent ability loss?
8. Standing up from Prone - does it take one of your action die to do this or all of your action dice? For example, could a level 6 fighter stand up with his first action die and then make an attack with his other action die in the same round?
9. „A wizard who sacrifices a full 20 points of ability scores in one fell swoop automatically treats his next spell check as a roll of natural 20.“ - pretty sure I saw this discussed somewhere already, but I couldn’t find it just now. The question that came up for us was, wouldn’t it be worse to spellburn 20 points than to spend merely 19? When spending 19, you would roll the d20 and add 19 points for the final spell result, with 20, you would not roll the die and merely add your regular Int + twice your caster level to a fixed result of 20.
Thanks!
-
- Cold-Blooded Diabolist
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 1:36 am
Re: Some more rules questions
Burning 20 does not result in a 5% chance to roll a natural 1 and have something unplanned happen despite your spellburn, whereas burning 19 does.Sir Robilar wrote:9. „A wizard who sacrifices a full 20 points of ability scores in one fell swoop automatically treats his next spell check as a roll of natural 20.“ - pretty sure I saw this discussed somewhere already, but I couldn’t find it just now. The question that came up for us was, wouldn’t it be worse to spellburn 20 points than to spend merely 19? When spending 19, you would roll the d20 and add 19 points for the final spell result, with 20, you would not roll the die and merely add your regular Int + twice your caster level to a fixed result of 20.
- Sir Robilar
- Far-Sighted Wanderer
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:38 pm
Re: Some more rules questions
Ah, that does make sense. So it's more of a security measure against the permanent ability loss and possible corruption.TheNobleDrake wrote: Burning 20 does not result in a 5% chance to roll a natural 1 and have something unplanned happen despite your spellburn, whereas burning 19 does.
Re: Some more rules questions
I don't rule it that way. I'd give the player the option to roll anyway, that way they could get a potentially much higher spell check result.
Or fail miserably and suffer hilarious corruption.
Or fail miserably and suffer hilarious corruption.
Re: Some more rules questions
I don't understand. How is giving them an option to roll the d20 going to get a higher potential roll result than 20?beermotor wrote:I don't rule it that way. I'd give the player the option to roll anyway, that way they could get a potentially much higher spell check result.
Or fail miserably and suffer hilarious corruption.
-
- Cold-Blooded Diabolist
- Posts: 525
- Joined: Fri Apr 06, 2012 1:36 am
Re: Some more rules questions
Because instead of taking a result of 20 and all the usual critical stuff to the roll, you instead roll with a +20 bonus on top of the rest of your typical stuff which could result in something like a 40+ check result.phg wrote:I don't understand. How is giving them an option to roll the d20 going to get a higher potential roll result than 20?
-
- Cold-Blooded Diabolist
- Posts: 471
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 9:14 am
- Location: Cube Farm of Alien Geometry
Re: Some more rules questions
Yeah, and even if they do roll a one, they could just burn a luck point to avoid the corruption, yes?TheNobleDrake wrote:Because instead of taking a result of 20 and all the usual critical stuff to the roll, you instead roll with a +20 bonus on top of the rest of your typical stuff which could result in something like a 40+ check result.phg wrote:I don't understand. How is giving them an option to roll the d20 going to get a higher potential roll result than 20?
Re: Some more rules questions
BUT WHERE'S THE FUN IN THAT?!?!?!cthulhudarren wrote:Yeah, and even if they do roll a one, they could just burn a luck point to avoid the corruption, yes?TheNobleDrake wrote:Because instead of taking a result of 20 and all the usual critical stuff to the roll, you instead roll with a +20 bonus on top of the rest of your typical stuff which could result in something like a 40+ check result.phg wrote:I don't understand. How is giving them an option to roll the d20 going to get a higher potential roll result than 20?
-
- Cold-Blooded Diabolist
- Posts: 471
- Joined: Mon Feb 09, 2009 9:14 am
- Location: Cube Farm of Alien Geometry
Re: Some more rules questions
0% fun in that.beermotor wrote:BUT WHERE'S THE FUN IN THAT?!?!?!cthulhudarren wrote:Yeah, and even if they do roll a one, they could just burn a luck point to avoid the corruption, yes?TheNobleDrake wrote:Because instead of taking a result of 20 and all the usual critical stuff to the roll, you instead roll with a +20 bonus on top of the rest of your typical stuff which could result in something like a 40+ check result.
- reverenddak
- Moderator
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:04 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: Some more rules questions
Actually, no. A natural 1 is always a failure. As it is with attacks and saving throws. And natural 20s are always successes with attacks & saving throws (and obviously with spell checks).cthulhudarren wrote: Yeah, and even if they do roll a one, they could just burn a luck point to avoid the corruption, yes?
Reverend Dakota Jesus Ultimak, S.S.M.o.t.S.M.S., D.M.
(Dungeon) Master In Chief of Crawl! fanzine. - http://www.crawlfanzine.com/
"[...] there is no doubt that Dungeons and Dragons and its imitators are right out of the pit of hell." - William Schnoebelen, Straight talk on Dungeons & Dragons
(Dungeon) Master In Chief of Crawl! fanzine. - http://www.crawlfanzine.com/
"[...] there is no doubt that Dungeons and Dragons and its imitators are right out of the pit of hell." - William Schnoebelen, Straight talk on Dungeons & Dragons
- Sir Robilar
- Far-Sighted Wanderer
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Jun 14, 2011 12:38 pm
Re: Some more rules questions
I think cthulhudarren was referring to the rule that wizards that suffer corruption can burn a point of Luck to avoid it (page 116: Luck to avoid corruption). I'm not a fan of that rule.reverenddak wrote:Actually, no. A natural 1 is always a failure. As it is with attacks and saving throws. And natural 20s are always successes with attacks & saving throws (and obviously with spell checks).cthulhudarren wrote: Yeah, and even if they do roll a one, they could just burn a luck point to avoid the corruption, yes?
- reverenddak
- Moderator
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:04 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: Some more rules questions
Oh, right. I pretend it doesn't exist.Sir Robilar wrote: I think cthulhudarren was referring to the rule that wizards that suffer corruption can burn a point of Luck to avoid it (page 116: Luck to avoid corruption). I'm not a fan of that rule.
Reverend Dakota Jesus Ultimak, S.S.M.o.t.S.M.S., D.M.
(Dungeon) Master In Chief of Crawl! fanzine. - http://www.crawlfanzine.com/
"[...] there is no doubt that Dungeons and Dragons and its imitators are right out of the pit of hell." - William Schnoebelen, Straight talk on Dungeons & Dragons
(Dungeon) Master In Chief of Crawl! fanzine. - http://www.crawlfanzine.com/
"[...] there is no doubt that Dungeons and Dragons and its imitators are right out of the pit of hell." - William Schnoebelen, Straight talk on Dungeons & Dragons
- Raven_Crowking
- Cold-Hearted Immortal
- Posts: 3159
- Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:41 am
- FLGS: The Sword & Board
- Contact:
Re: Some more rules questions
I am fine with that rule. Wizards do not automatically regain Luck, and when Luck gets low enough, strange things can happen.Sir Robilar wrote:I think cthulhudarren was referring to the rule that wizards that suffer corruption can burn a point of Luck to avoid it (page 116: Luck to avoid corruption). I'm not a fan of that rule.
SoBH pbp:
Cathbad the Meek (herbalist Wizard 1): AC 9; 4 hp; S 7, A 7, St 10, P 17, I 13, L 8; Neutral; Club, herbs, 50' rope, 50 cp; -1 to melee attack rolls. Hideous scar.
Cathbad the Meek (herbalist Wizard 1): AC 9; 4 hp; S 7, A 7, St 10, P 17, I 13, L 8; Neutral; Club, herbs, 50' rope, 50 cp; -1 to melee attack rolls. Hideous scar.
- Skyscraper
- Steely-Eyed Heathen-Slayer
- Posts: 660
- Joined: Wed Jul 04, 2012 12:23 pm
- Location: Montreal
Re: Some more rules questions
Fixed that for you.Raven_Crowking wrote: I am fine with that rule. Wizards do not automatically regain Luck, and when Luck gets low enough, Strange Things can happen by.
Maledict Brothbreath, level 4 warrior, STR 16 (+2) AGI 7 (-1) STA 12 PER 9 INT 10 LUCK 15 (+1), AC: 16 Refl: +1 Fort: +2 Will: +1; lawful; Armor of the Lion and Lily's Blade.
Brother Sufferus, level 4 cleric, STR 13 (+1) AGI 15 (+1) STA 11 PER 13 (+1) INT 10 LUCK 9, AC: 11 (13 if wounded, 15 if down to half hit points), Refl: +3 Fort: +2 Will: +3, chaotic, Robe of the Faith, Scourge of the Maimed One, Darts of Pain.
Brother Sufferus, level 4 cleric, STR 13 (+1) AGI 15 (+1) STA 11 PER 13 (+1) INT 10 LUCK 9, AC: 11 (13 if wounded, 15 if down to half hit points), Refl: +3 Fort: +2 Will: +3, chaotic, Robe of the Faith, Scourge of the Maimed One, Darts of Pain.