Starting languages
Moderators: DJ LaBoss, finarvyn, michaelcurtis, Harley Stroh
- viktor_haag
- Ill-Fated Peasant
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Wed Jun 08, 2011 11:02 am
- Contact:
Starting languages
The starting language allotments for the racial classes seems odd. All classes know common, but racial classes know their own racial languages if their INT is 8+? That seems backwards. Why not have the racial classes know their own racial languages, and common if they have an INT 8+ instead?
I do realize this makes including one in a party a bit more problematic, and that the "common tongue" is really a mechanical conceit to aid game play and not tremendously sensible to begin with, but a lot of people portray it as the campaign area's "lingua franca" and in that case it seems odd that Elves, Dwarves, and so forth would have common but not "their own tongues"...
I do realize this makes including one in a party a bit more problematic, and that the "common tongue" is really a mechanical conceit to aid game play and not tremendously sensible to begin with, but a lot of people portray it as the campaign area's "lingua franca" and in that case it seems odd that Elves, Dwarves, and so forth would have common but not "their own tongues"...
Viktor Haag -- You might very well think so...
-
- Chaos-Summoning Sorcerer
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 3:28 am
Re: Starting languages
And where is Appendix L?
- reverenddak
- Moderator
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:04 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: Starting languages
I'm sure it's function of practicality over realism. Language plays heavily in some Appendix N stuff, Princess of Mars comes to mind. It would also play heavily in a politically charged game too. But I'm sure that's not where DCC RPG wants to go.viktor_haag wrote:The starting language allotments for the racial classes seems odd. All classes know common, but racial classes know their own racial languages if their INT is 8+? That seems backwards. Why not have the racial classes know their own racial languages, and common if they have an INT 8+ instead?
Reverend Dakota Jesus Ultimak, S.S.M.o.t.S.M.S., D.M.
(Dungeon) Master In Chief of Crawl! fanzine. - http://www.crawlfanzine.com/
"[...] there is no doubt that Dungeons and Dragons and its imitators are right out of the pit of hell." - William Schnoebelen, Straight talk on Dungeons & Dragons
(Dungeon) Master In Chief of Crawl! fanzine. - http://www.crawlfanzine.com/
"[...] there is no doubt that Dungeons and Dragons and its imitators are right out of the pit of hell." - William Schnoebelen, Straight talk on Dungeons & Dragons
- reverenddak
- Moderator
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:04 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: Starting languages
hehe, it's right after Appendix K!jmucchiello wrote:And where is Appendix L?
Reverend Dakota Jesus Ultimak, S.S.M.o.t.S.M.S., D.M.
(Dungeon) Master In Chief of Crawl! fanzine. - http://www.crawlfanzine.com/
"[...] there is no doubt that Dungeons and Dragons and its imitators are right out of the pit of hell." - William Schnoebelen, Straight talk on Dungeons & Dragons
(Dungeon) Master In Chief of Crawl! fanzine. - http://www.crawlfanzine.com/
"[...] there is no doubt that Dungeons and Dragons and its imitators are right out of the pit of hell." - William Schnoebelen, Straight talk on Dungeons & Dragons
-
- Wild-Eyed Zealot
- Posts: 77
- Joined: Mon Apr 11, 2011 10:04 pm
Re: Starting languages
Joseph stated that the Beta document was NOT the full rules. It does not include spells above level 1 or all the appendixes.
Languages are one of those things that will be totally campaign dependent anyway. I don't think anyone is Shadizar spoke Orc since they don't exist!
Languages are one of those things that will be totally campaign dependent anyway. I don't think anyone is Shadizar spoke Orc since they don't exist!
Re: Starting languages
I too thought it odd initially, but it is immanently practical. And of course this is a detail that could be handled campaign wise.
-
- Cold-Hearted Immortal
- Posts: 2704
- Joined: Sun Dec 01, 2002 12:41 pm
- Location: San Jose, CA
Re: Starting languages
It's on my manuscript on my computer. What, you don't have a copy??jmucchiello wrote:And where is Appendix L?
Here is the primary content of Appendix L. I can't get this table to format correctly but you get the idea. If I can figure out the formatting I'll circle back and try to make it display correctly...
Code: Select all
Appendix L: Languages
All characters begin the game knowing the Common tongue. More intelligent characters know additional languages: for every point of Int modifier, a character learns one more language. Finally, some characters may also learn more languages when they advance to level 1 in a class, as noted below:
Wizard: automatically know two additional languages for every point of Int modifier, meaning that when they advance from level 0 to level 1, they roll an additional language for every point of Int modifier in addition to the languages they knew at level 1.
Thief: automatically learn thieves’ cant at level 1.
Elf, dwarf, and halfling: at level 1, demi-humans learn one additional language beyond Common, their racial language, and the languages earned by Int modifiers.
Warrior, cleric: do not earn any additional languages when advancing from level 0 to level 1. However, they may learn languages due to magic or improved ability scores, so their class entries are also included below.
Known languages are randomly determined by rolling d% on the table below:
Language % Chance to Know Language, by Class
0-Level Human† Warrior Cleric Thief Wizard Halfling Elf Dwarf
Alignment tongue* 01-20 01-20 01-20 01-15 01-10 01-25 01-20 01-20
Chaos** – – – 16-20 11-13 – 21-25 –
Law** – – – 21-25 14-16 – 26-30 –
Neutrality** – – – 26-30 17-19 – 31-35 –
Dwarf 21-30 21-30 21-25 31-32 20-21 26-35 36-40 –
Elf 31-35 31-35 26-30 33-34 22-23 36-40 – 21-25
Halfling 36-40 36-38 31-35 35-44 24-25 – 41-45 26-35
Gnome 41-45 – 36-40 45-49 26-27 41-50 – 36-40
Bugbear 46-47 39-43 41-45 50-54 28-29 51-55 – 41-45
Goblin 48-57 44-53 46-55 55-64 30-35 56-70 46-48 46-55
Gnoll 58-60 54-58 56-60 65-69 36-39 – 49-50 56-60
Harpy – 59-63 – 70-71 40-41 – 51-52 –
Hobgoblin 61-65 64-70 61-65 72-74 42-45 71-80 53-54 61-65
Kobold 66-65 71-78 66-75 75-78 46-49 81-90 55-57 66-75
Lizard man 76-80 79-81 76-78 79 50-53 – 58 –
Minotaur 81 82-83 – – 54-55 – 59 76
Ogre 82-83 84-88 79-80 – 56-57 – 60 77-81
Orc 84-93 89-95 81-82 – 58-62 – 61-63 82-86
Serpent-man – 96 83 80-81 63-65 – 64 –
Troglodyte 94-99 97-98 84-88 82-83 66-68 – 65 87-91
Angelic (a.k.a. Celestial) – – 89-92 – 69-72 – 66-70 –
Centaur – – 93 – 73 – 71-75 –
Demonic (a.k.a. Infernal or Abyssal) – – 94-97 84 74-79 – 76-80 –
Doppelganger – – – 85 80 – – –
Dragon – – 98 86-87 81-84 – 81-85 92-93
Pixie – – 99 88-89 85-86 91-93 86-90 –
Giant 100 99-100 100 90-91 87-88 – – 94-97
Griffon – – – – 89 – – –
Naga – – – – 90 – 91-92 –
Bear – – – – 91-92 – – 98
Eagle – – – – 93-94 – 93-94 –
Ferret – – – – – 94-98 – –
Horse – – – – 95-96 – 95-96 –
Wolf – – – – 97-98 – – –
Spider – – – – 99 – – –
Undercommon – – – 92-100 100 99-100 97-100 99-100
† Use the elf, dwarf, or halfling column for 0-level demi-humans.
* Chaos, Law, or Neutrality depending on character’s alignment.
** Re-roll if this duplicates a result of the character’s alignment tongue.
-
- Ill-Fated Peasant
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sun Jun 12, 2011 6:36 pm
Re: Starting languages
Having characters with Int less than 8 start out knowing only their racial languages would be very interesting, in my opinion. DCC seems to revel in the initial limitations of characters and great stories come from overcoming those limitations, so it only makes sense to have Common be a second language to non-humans.
- DCCfan
- Steely-Eyed Heathen-Slayer
- Posts: 638
- Joined: Sun Jun 03, 2007 6:23 am
- FLGS: The Comics Club
- Location: Auburndale, FL
Re: Starting languages
This seems backwards to me as well. I guess you could say that the dwarf or elf was raised by humans and knows nothing of thier culture.viktor_haag wrote:The starting language allotments for the racial classes seems odd. All classes know common, but racial classes know their own racial languages if their INT is 8+? That seems backwards. Why not have the racial classes know their own racial languages, and common if they have an INT 8+ instead?
"When creating your character,choose an ethical system that can justify nearly any fit of temper, greed, cowardice, or vindictiveness, for example, Chaotic Violent..."
THE PROTOCOLS, ADVANCED PROTOCOL #10
THE PROTOCOLS, ADVANCED PROTOCOL #10
- reverenddak
- Moderator
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 11:04 am
- Location: Los Angeles
- Contact:
Re: Starting languages
I thought there weren't going to be any generic monsters? That language list suggests otherwise.
Reverend Dakota Jesus Ultimak, S.S.M.o.t.S.M.S., D.M.
(Dungeon) Master In Chief of Crawl! fanzine. - http://www.crawlfanzine.com/
"[...] there is no doubt that Dungeons and Dragons and its imitators are right out of the pit of hell." - William Schnoebelen, Straight talk on Dungeons & Dragons
(Dungeon) Master In Chief of Crawl! fanzine. - http://www.crawlfanzine.com/
"[...] there is no doubt that Dungeons and Dragons and its imitators are right out of the pit of hell." - William Schnoebelen, Straight talk on Dungeons & Dragons
- finarvyn
- Cold-Hearted Immortal
- Posts: 2599
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:42 am
- FLGS: Fair Game, Downers Grove IL
- Location: Chicago suburbs
- Contact:
Re: Starting languages
In Poul Anderson's "The Broken Sword" there were Trolls. Tolkien's books have orcs and goblins. Conan fights snakes and bigger snakes. There clearly are some cases where generic is okay. Joseph was concerned that the lack of basic monsters might turn off possible customers, but the emphasis in the campaign hopefully will be on unique monsters.reverenddak wrote:I thought there weren't going to be any generic monsters? That language list suggests otherwise.
I think that this is also the planned philosophy behind spells, that there will be some basic ones that you learn at WizTech and others that are unique to the wizard in the campaign. So some generic ones are included to get things rolling, but then characters have to find spells as the campaign progresses and these may or may not be BTB spells.
Also, generic monsters make module conversion a lot easier.
Marv / Finarvyn
DCC Minister of Propaganda; Deputized 6/8/11 (over 11 years of SPAM bustin'!)
DCC RPG playtester 2011, DCC Lankhmar trivia contest winner 2015; OD&D player since 1975
"The worthy GM never purposely kills players' PCs, He presents opportunities for the rash and unthinking players to do that all on their own."
-- Gary Gygax
"Don't ask me what you need to hit. Just roll the die and I will let you know!"
-- Dave Arneson
"Misinterpreting the rules is a shared memory for many of us"
-- Joseph Goodman
DCC Minister of Propaganda; Deputized 6/8/11 (over 11 years of SPAM bustin'!)
DCC RPG playtester 2011, DCC Lankhmar trivia contest winner 2015; OD&D player since 1975
"The worthy GM never purposely kills players' PCs, He presents opportunities for the rash and unthinking players to do that all on their own."
-- Gary Gygax
"Don't ask me what you need to hit. Just roll the die and I will let you know!"
-- Dave Arneson
"Misinterpreting the rules is a shared memory for many of us"
-- Joseph Goodman
Re: Starting languages
I think the intent is not to have generic lists of stats that players will have memorized. So, you may still have zombies, but exactly what a zombie can do will be creepy, unknown and surprising. Likewise with trolls. Do they regenerate? Are they smart or stupid? Do they turn to stone instantly in sunlight? Can they shrink to halfling size and skulk around the village? Are they incredibly honorable, always letting you pass if you pay their toll? Are they vulnerable to goat attacks?reverenddak wrote:I thought there weren't going to be any generic monsters? That language list suggests otherwise.
So, you have a creature named troll, but the players don't know what they are meeting when they come across one. However, they can still think their way through the situation. At least, that is my take on the whole thing.
- Ogrepuppy
- Tight-Lipped Warlock
- Posts: 921
- Joined: Thu Jul 06, 2006 11:26 pm
- Location: the Towers of Carcosa
Re: Starting languages
I read that section of the Beta as "racial classes know their race's language AND Common, but get additional languages when they get to level 1" as a function of them traveling the world and meeting (or fighting!) new cultures.viktor_haag wrote:The starting language allotments for the racial classes seems odd. All classes know common, but racial classes know their own racial languages if their INT is 8+? That seems backwards.