Movement + action

For DCC RPG rules discussion. Includes rules questions and ideas, new rules suggestions, homebrews and hacks, conversions to other systems, and everything else rules-related.

Moderators: DJ LaBoss, finarvyn, michaelcurtis, Harley Stroh

Post Reply
Muddy64
Ill-Fated Peasant
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:00 am
FLGS: Acropolis Games
Location: MI, USA

Movement + action

Post by Muddy64 »

A player can move and perform an action in a turn. I don't understand the advantage or rationale for this - it seems to complicate things, why not move or act?

If a player in engaged in combat, and a second is closing in (moving then attacking), does the first get an attack while the other is closing in (using their movement before attacking)?
User avatar
Raven_Crowking
Cold-Hearted Immortal
Posts: 3159
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:41 am
FLGS: The Sword & Board
Contact:

Re: Movement + action

Post by Raven_Crowking »

You can sacrifice your Action Die for an extra move, and you can get more Action Dice as you go up in level.

Consider Move to be a free Action Die that can only be used to move.
SoBH pbp:

Cathbad the Meek (herbalist Wizard 1): AC 9; 4 hp; S 7, A 7, St 10, P 17, I 13, L 8; Neutral; Club, herbs, 50' rope, 50 cp; -1 to melee attack rolls. Hideous scar.
User avatar
GnomeBoy
Tyrant Master (Administrator)
Posts: 4126
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 1:46 pm
FLGS: Bizarro World
Location: Left Coast, USA
Contact:

Re: Movement + action

Post by GnomeBoy »

You act on your initiative. You get to move (if you want to) and do something with your Action Die (if you want to).

You can houserule it however you'd like, that someone can hold back their Action Die and "interrupt" an approaching foe with an attack. This game is very adaptable to your own preferences.

What other RPG systems have you played? I don't understand what makes it seem complicated.
...
Gnome Boy • DCC playtester @ DDC 35 Feb '11. • Beta DL 2111, 7AM PT, 8 June 11.
Playing RPGs since '77 • Quasi-occasional member of the Legion of 8th-Level Fighters.

Link: Here Be 100+ DCC Monsters

bygrinstow.com - The Home of Inner Ham
Muddy64
Ill-Fated Peasant
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:00 am
FLGS: Acropolis Games
Location: MI, USA

Re: Movement + action

Post by Muddy64 »

Thanks guys. I don’t think it is terribly complicated, just moreso than if only one action - a move or an attack- were allowed.

I’ll try to put it another way. Why should a first level character engaged in combat get only one attack while another first level member the party gets a full move and also an attack?

I’m getting back into rpg after many many years, have played d&d up through AD&D 1st ed.
User avatar
Raven_Crowking
Cold-Hearted Immortal
Posts: 3159
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:41 am
FLGS: The Sword & Board
Contact:

Re: Movement + action

Post by Raven_Crowking »

Muddy64 wrote:Thanks guys. I don’t think it is terribly complicated, just moreso than if only one action - a move or an attack- were allowed.

I’ll try to put it another way. Why should a first level character engaged in combat get only one attack while another first level member the party gets a full move and also an attack?

I’m getting back into rpg after many many years, have played d&d up through AD&D 1st ed.
It can be dangerous trying to escape from a combat - your opponent gets a free attack if they have a readied weapon (which would include a natural weapon, IMHO...most monsters are always armed!). That might make a PC want to stay put.

I would certainly allow a Mighty Deed to shield you from this free attack, or even shield another. My mighty warrior rushes in, so that the wizard can back up and cast a spell! Or, at least, not die next round!

Don't forget that move + attack may also mean attack + move. And, since an Action Die can be sacrificed for an extra move, at higher levels that may be move + attack + move. A mounted combatant can likewise use the mount's move, make an attack, and then use the mount's Action Die to move (probably triggering a free attack).
SoBH pbp:

Cathbad the Meek (herbalist Wizard 1): AC 9; 4 hp; S 7, A 7, St 10, P 17, I 13, L 8; Neutral; Club, herbs, 50' rope, 50 cp; -1 to melee attack rolls. Hideous scar.
User avatar
Raven_Crowking
Cold-Hearted Immortal
Posts: 3159
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:41 am
FLGS: The Sword & Board
Contact:

Re: Movement + action

Post by Raven_Crowking »

But every PC gets a move and an action if they want it.
SoBH pbp:

Cathbad the Meek (herbalist Wizard 1): AC 9; 4 hp; S 7, A 7, St 10, P 17, I 13, L 8; Neutral; Club, herbs, 50' rope, 50 cp; -1 to melee attack rolls. Hideous scar.
User avatar
GnomeBoy
Tyrant Master (Administrator)
Posts: 4126
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 1:46 pm
FLGS: Bizarro World
Location: Left Coast, USA
Contact:

Re: Movement + action

Post by GnomeBoy »

Muddy64 wrote:Why should a first level character engaged in combat get only one attack while another first level member the party gets a full move and also an attack
Circumstances.

I can't tell if you think it's "not right" because it seems like that one player is getting the short stick, or what. I mean, sometimes you don't need to move, so why would you? I could get up from this keyboard at any time, but if I did so without reason I might not finish thi
...
Gnome Boy • DCC playtester @ DDC 35 Feb '11. • Beta DL 2111, 7AM PT, 8 June 11.
Playing RPGs since '77 • Quasi-occasional member of the Legion of 8th-Level Fighters.

Link: Here Be 100+ DCC Monsters

bygrinstow.com - The Home of Inner Ham
Muddy64
Ill-Fated Peasant
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:00 am
FLGS: Acropolis Games
Location: MI, USA

Re: Movement + action

Post by Muddy64 »

GnomeBoy wrote:
Muddy64 wrote:Why should a first level character engaged in combat get only one attack while another first level member the party gets a full move and also an attack
Circumstances.

I can't tell if you think it's "not right" because it seems like that one player is getting the short stick, or what. I mean, sometimes you don't need to move, so why would you? I could get up from this keyboard at any time, but if I did so without reason I might not finish thi
The player engaged in melee seems to be getting the sort stick. Both the move and attack take time. One player has time to move and attack, the other only time to attack. Why? if they aren't moving, why not another attack while the other player is moving (or while the other player attacks, whatever).
User avatar
Raven_Crowking
Cold-Hearted Immortal
Posts: 3159
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:41 am
FLGS: The Sword & Board
Contact:

Re: Movement + action

Post by Raven_Crowking »

The player engaged in melee combat gets the "short end of the stick" because someone (or something!) is right next to him trying to kill him. It is far easier to move about when someone is not standing next to you and trying to kill you.

BUT

The text on page 312 of the core rules supersedes this. If you are running the game, and you want to allow an attack for a move, it's your call. You'll need to consider whether or not the creatures encountered can do the same, of course.
SoBH pbp:

Cathbad the Meek (herbalist Wizard 1): AC 9; 4 hp; S 7, A 7, St 10, P 17, I 13, L 8; Neutral; Club, herbs, 50' rope, 50 cp; -1 to melee attack rolls. Hideous scar.
Muddy64
Ill-Fated Peasant
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:00 am
FLGS: Acropolis Games
Location: MI, USA

Re: Movement + action

Post by Muddy64 »

Raven_Crowking wrote:The player engaged in melee combat gets the "short end of the stick" because someone (or something!) is right next to him trying to kill him. It is far easier to move about when someone is not standing next to you and trying to kill you.

BUT

The text on page 312 of the core rules supersedes this. If you are running the game, and you want to allow an attack for a move, it's your call. You'll need to consider whether or not the creatures encountered can do the same, of course.
Thanks, I see the point about the difficulty involved in moving while in combat, though it seems like a distinct thing to me.

I'll check p. 312

EDITED TO ADD -

It wasn't unfairness (short end of the stick was someone else's phrase) so much as finding a way to make sense of it to me (as a DM/ref) / make it realistic that has been motivating me.
User avatar
Raven_Crowking
Cold-Hearted Immortal
Posts: 3159
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 9:41 am
FLGS: The Sword & Board
Contact:

Re: Movement + action

Post by Raven_Crowking »

Muddy64 wrote:Thanks, I see the point about the difficulty involved in moving while in combat, though it seems like a distinct thing to me.
The guy in melee can still move, it just provokes a free attack if he moves out of melee.
SoBH pbp:

Cathbad the Meek (herbalist Wizard 1): AC 9; 4 hp; S 7, A 7, St 10, P 17, I 13, L 8; Neutral; Club, herbs, 50' rope, 50 cp; -1 to melee attack rolls. Hideous scar.
User avatar
GnomeBoy
Tyrant Master (Administrator)
Posts: 4126
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 1:46 pm
FLGS: Bizarro World
Location: Left Coast, USA
Contact:

Re: Movement + action

Post by GnomeBoy »

So the crux of it is, one guy gets to do two things, while the other guy just gets to do one thing and "why can't everyone just do two things? ...two attacks, two moves, a move and an attack, an attack and a skill check, etc."

In that case, the answer to 'why' is 'history'. As in, it's been the basic method for a long, long time. I don't know if Wells' Little Wars used something like it, or not, but it goes way back. It's well vetted.

But by all means, experiment, change it up, see how it works. Just report back on your findings so we can all benefit.
...
Gnome Boy • DCC playtester @ DDC 35 Feb '11. • Beta DL 2111, 7AM PT, 8 June 11.
Playing RPGs since '77 • Quasi-occasional member of the Legion of 8th-Level Fighters.

Link: Here Be 100+ DCC Monsters

bygrinstow.com - The Home of Inner Ham
Muddy64
Ill-Fated Peasant
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Dec 09, 2017 10:00 am
FLGS: Acropolis Games
Location: MI, USA

Re: Movement + action

Post by Muddy64 »

GnomeBoy wrote:So the crux of it is, one guy gets to do two things, while the other guy just gets to do one thing and "why can't everyone just do two things? ...two attacks, two moves, a move and an attack, an attack and a skill check, etc."
Exactly - and therefore why not just say one act per turn.
GnomeBoy wrote:In that case, the answer to 'why' is 'history'. As in, it's been the basic method for a long, long time. I don't know if Wells' Little Wars used something like it, or not, but it goes way back. It's well vetted.
Fair enough. My concern is making it realistic/plausible during play. So I was half expecting a response like "abstract nature of combat" or something like that. EDIT: Or maybe that it balances out/becomes less of a difference at higher levels.
GnomeBoy wrote:But by all means, experiment, change it up, see how it works. Just report back on your findings so we can all benefit.
Will do. I'm hoping to get a game in our area sometime soon.
User avatar
GnomeBoy
Tyrant Master (Administrator)
Posts: 4126
Joined: Fri Mar 10, 2006 1:46 pm
FLGS: Bizarro World
Location: Left Coast, USA
Contact:

Re: Movement + action

Post by GnomeBoy »

Muddy64 wrote:Exactly - and therefore why not just say one act per turn.
Round One:
- Player: I move up so I can hit the bad guy on my next turn.
- Judge: The bad guy moves away from you.

Round Two:
- Player: I move up so I can hit the bad guy on my next turn.
- Judge: The bad guy moves away from you.

Round Three:
- Player: I move on to a different game. Thanks, be seeing you...
...
Gnome Boy • DCC playtester @ DDC 35 Feb '11. • Beta DL 2111, 7AM PT, 8 June 11.
Playing RPGs since '77 • Quasi-occasional member of the Legion of 8th-Level Fighters.

Link: Here Be 100+ DCC Monsters

bygrinstow.com - The Home of Inner Ham
Post Reply

Return to “Rules discussion”