Powergaming: Basic ability vs Specialization

A forum to discuss the Eldritch Role-Playing System.

Moderators: finarvyn, dancross

Locked
User avatar
dunbruha
Mighty-Thewed Reaver
Posts: 304
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 4:00 pm
Location: Virginia

Powergaming: Basic ability vs Specialization

Post by dunbruha »

Has this situation come up any any playtesting? As a character advances in level, the player puts CPs into the Basic Ability instead of Specialization or Masteries, so that he can be "covered" over a broad range of situations. Example: Agiliity. Rather than put CPs into Jump or Swim or Balance, all CPs are put into the Basic ability, so that he would be better at swimming AND jumping AND balancing (but not as good at any particular one).

I guess the question is: "Does it pay to be a generalist?" I know that you can roll more dice with Specializations/Masteries, but is this "better" than a high Basic score? What would a Powergamer do?
EvilCat
Wild-Eyed Zealot
Posts: 67
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 11:38 pm

Re: Powergaming: Basic ability vs Specialization

Post by EvilCat »

I did this table some time ago, to answer my player's question "how good is my 3d4 ability?". Well, it's not surprising that rolling more dice rather than bigger dice provides better chances for success. Even 2d6 (6 CP) is better than 1d12 (8 CP).

But... we have some specialized characters in current game. For example, the hunter orc with Knowledge d4 > Monsters d6. When things don't concern monsters - but the geopraphy, for example - he's nothing special. Other character has Contacts d4 > Otherworlders d4, which would be helpful when traveling other planes, but for having contacts in average mundane village (where our adventure happens) he rolled just one d4 and failed.

They all would be better with _these_ rolls if they had higher basic ability. But if they want to have high rank in mastery, they have to raise specialization up to same rank, at least. And with mastery you have three dice, which is much better than two, even if in rare circumstances.

That's how I understood it...
Attachments
chances.png
chances.png (62.96 KiB) Viewed 10005 times
StormPatriarch
Hard-Bitten Adventurer
Posts: 173
Joined: Tue Apr 08, 2008 6:07 am

Re: Powergaming: Basic ability vs Specialization

Post by StormPatriarch »

EvilCat wrote:I did this table some time ago, to answer my player's question "how good is my 3d4 ability?". Well, it's not surprising that rolling more dice rather than bigger dice provides better chances for success. Even 2d6 (6 CP) is better than 1d12 (8 CP).

But... we have some specialized characters in current game. For example, the hunter orc with Knowledge d4 > Monsters d6. When things don't concern monsters - but the geopraphy, for example - he's nothing special. Other character has Contacts d4 > Otherworlders d4, which would be helpful when traveling other planes, but for having contacts in average mundane village (where our adventure happens) he rolled just one d4 and failed.

They all would be better with _these_ rolls if they had higher basic ability. But if they want to have high rank in mastery, they have to raise specialization up to same rank, at least. And with mastery you have three dice, which is much better than two, even if in rare circumstances.

That's how I understood it...

Well that's just cool... :D
"I am the soul of honor, kindness, mercy, and goodness. Trust me in all things." Corwin to Dara, The Guns of Avalon

"...I was the lesser evil." --Bleys to Corwin, Nine Princes in Amber
Banesfinger
Wild-Eyed Zealot
Posts: 90
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:46 am

Re: Powergaming: Basic ability vs Specialization

Post by Banesfinger »

EvilCat wrote:Even 2d6 (6 CP) is better than 1d12 (8 CP).
Yes, from a CP to CP point-of-view, more dice is always better.
E.g.: d6 (2 CP) vs 2d4 (2 CP)

But you also have to look at the specialties: how many, how often, etc. The rule's guideline is "Specialization should be useful in about 10-20% of the uses of the base skill." However, this varies widely from ability to ability.

For example: Agility has 4 listed specializations (Acrobatics, Balance, Jump, Swim) and I can think of several other non-listed ones that could possibly arise. This is a prime example of the 10-20% rule. To get the most out of your CPs, I would invest in the base skill, since specializations will only be applicable 10% of the time.

Climbing on the other hand, only has 2 listed specializations (man-made surfaces, natural surfaces). I can't think of another situation that wouldn't fall into those 2 categories. This breaks the rule and thus, each specialization would be useful in 50% of the situations. This is a good ability to specialize in.

Combat abilities are also good to specialize in. Not because they break the 10-20% rule (there are about 8 melee specializations), but because Heroes generally stick to one specific weapon.
mythfish
Chaos-Summoning Sorcerer
Posts: 790
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 1:47 pm
Location: Louisville, KY
Contact:

Re: Powergaming: Basic ability vs Specialization

Post by mythfish »

Banesfinger wrote:Climbing on the other hand, only has 2 listed specializations (man-made surfaces, natural surfaces). I can't think of another situation that wouldn't fall into those 2 categories. This breaks the rule and thus, each specialization would be useful in 50% of the situations. This is a good ability to specialize in.
You can specialize in more than just what you're climbing, you can specialize in how you climb (such as climbing quickly or climbing one-handed or climbing stealthily). You can specialize in climbing surfaces in a particular state (such as climbing slick surfaces or climbing vertical surfaces). It could also be argued that climbing a free-hanging rope or free-standing pole would not qualify as climbing a "surface".
Dieter Zimmerman
[[Faceless Minion of the Dark Master]]
Banesfinger
Wild-Eyed Zealot
Posts: 90
Joined: Mon Apr 02, 2007 10:46 am

Re: Powergaming: Basic ability vs Specialization

Post by Banesfinger »

mythfish wrote:You can specialize in more than just what you're climbing, you can specialize in how you climb (such as climbing quickly or climbing one-handed or climbing stealthily). You can specialize in climbing surfaces in a particular state (such as climbing slick surfaces or climbing vertical surfaces).
How would "State" or "How" climbing specializations work? Wouldn't those 'overlap' the specializations from the core rules?

Using your example, mythfish, say a PC was climbing a mountain one-handed (the "How"), couldn't it be argued he was also climbing a Natural Surface?
Likewise, a PC climbing a wet (the "State") building, would also be covered by Man-Made Surface?

Since you can't use more than 1 branch of an ability chain in the same roll, wouldn't it be more advantageous to just specialize in the two core specializations? (Which answers the opening post's question).
mythfish
Chaos-Summoning Sorcerer
Posts: 790
Joined: Thu Sep 30, 2004 1:47 pm
Location: Louisville, KY
Contact:

Re: Powergaming: Basic ability vs Specialization

Post by mythfish »

Oh, right, it'd be silly to have both specializations. I was just pointing out that there are more options than the two listed in the book.
Dieter Zimmerman
[[Faceless Minion of the Dark Master]]
User avatar
dunbruha
Mighty-Thewed Reaver
Posts: 304
Joined: Sun May 04, 2008 4:00 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Powergaming: Basic ability vs Specialization

Post by dunbruha »

EvilCat wrote:I did this table some time ago, to answer my player's question "how good is my 3d4 ability?". Well, it's not surprising that rolling more dice rather than bigger dice provides better chances for success. Even 2d6 (6 CP) is better than 1d12 (8 CP).

But... we have some specialized characters in current game. For example, the hunter orc with Knowledge d4 > Monsters d6. When things don't concern monsters - but the geopraphy, for example - he's nothing special. Other character has Contacts d4 > Otherworlders d4, which would be helpful when traveling other planes, but for having contacts in average mundane village (where our adventure happens) he rolled just one d4 and failed.

They all would be better with _these_ rolls if they had higher basic ability. But if they want to have high rank in mastery, they have to raise specialization up to same rank, at least. And with mastery you have three dice, which is much better than two, even if in rare circumstances.

That's how I understood it...
Very cool table! What do the bolded lines signify?
dancross
Cold-Blooded Diabolist
Posts: 528
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 9:32 pm

Re: Powergaming: Basic ability vs Specialization

Post by dancross »

EvilCat,

that chart ought to be reproduced in the core rules in the future. it is VERY useful.
dancross
Cold-Blooded Diabolist
Posts: 528
Joined: Sat Sep 08, 2007 9:32 pm

Re: Powergaming: Basic ability vs Specialization

Post by dancross »

EvilCat wrote:I did this table some time ago, to answer my player's question "how good is my 3d4 ability?". Well, it's not surprising that rolling more dice rather than bigger dice provides better chances for success. Even 2d6 (6 CP) is better than 1d12 (8 CP).

But... we have some specialized characters in current game. For example, the hunter orc with Knowledge d4 > Monsters d6. When things don't concern monsters - but the geopraphy, for example - he's nothing special. Other character has Contacts d4 > Otherworlders d4, which would be helpful when traveling other planes, but for having contacts in average mundane village (where our adventure happens) he rolled just one d4 and failed.

They all would be better with _these_ rolls if they had higher basic ability. But if they want to have high rank in mastery, they have to raise specialization up to same rank, at least. And with mastery you have three dice, which is much better than two, even if in rare circumstances.

That's how I understood it...
I can also see choosing skill levels based on ascending MRV rather than just die-ranks. That might be too strict a progression for PCs, but I can see it as useful as quick reference when creating NPC and monsters.
EvilCat
Wild-Eyed Zealot
Posts: 67
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2008 11:38 pm

Re: Powergaming: Basic ability vs Specialization

Post by EvilCat »

dunbruha wrote:Very cool table! What do the bolded lines signify?
Most used combinations. I guess extremes like 2d12 are less used than 2d4 or 3d8.
dancross wrote:that chart ought to be reproduced in the core rules in the future. it is VERY useful.
Just check it with some pro or such... I think I used right algorithm and results look sound, but who knows... I can send source xls via e-mail.
Locked

Return to “Eldritch Role-Playing System”